close
我們這組在進行報告分工制度之後的第一份報告結果下來了，教授寫了落落長的email點出報告裡的缺點：
一開始他說我們的摘要沒提到任何細節：It is not good form to devote almost half of the executive summary to presentation of what to do if your recommendation fails or is not implemented!
接下來他說我們都只是在複述背景資料： takes two full pages on background (most of which is presumably fully known by all senior executives).
然後因為我們先提圖表4再提圖表1~3：which is not good form
再來假設營運收入每年成長3%被質疑：Nothing grows in perpetuity!
接著又說我們沒解釋我們自己做的假設 以及某個圖表沒有結論等等…
最後結論的部分： recommendation proves unsuccessful are OK, but do not need to be included in the Executive Summary.意思是說改善的意見其實不OK，而且不需在摘要裡再提一次。
前幾天讀了「女工程師的紐約生活手札」的 White Lie後真是心有戚戚焉，因為美國人用的形容詞常常都比實際要好一點，所以我一開始都搞不清楚他們心裡到底怎麼想。像這次我的組員看到成績後就回大家email：We did well …It’s not bad...像我以前就會天真地以為他說：幹的好~不錯哦…
而我還是很中肯地回大家：I think professor's comments are very useful, not only in this case. It helps us do better~
而我還是很中肯地回大家：I think professor's comments are very useful, not only in this case. It helps us do better~
全站熱搜
留言列表
